HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P.SANDESH
HANMAGOUDA AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P/200377/2019
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION No.200377/2019
BETWEEN:
1.
HANMAGOUDA
S/O GANGAPPA MANKANI
AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE
R/O BANGARGOND VILLAGE
TQ. MUDDEBIHAL, DIST. VIJAYAPURA
2.
HAMJISAB
S/O MALIKSAB SOMALAPUR
AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER
R/O MAROL, TQ. HUNGUND
NOW R/AT MUDDEBIHAL
TQ. MUDDEBIHAL, DIST. VIJAYAPUR
3.
GANGADHAR S/O MALKAJAPPA HADPAD
AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER
R/O YARAZERI, TQ. MUDDEBIHAL
DIST. VIJAYAPUR
… PETITIONERS
(BY SRI RAJESH G. DODDAMANI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH MUDDEBIHAL POLICE STATION
NOW REPRESENTED BY THE ADDL. SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH-585105
… RESPONDENT
(BY SRI GURURAJ V. HASILKAR, HCGP)
R
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482
OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ORDER OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDDEBIHAL DATED
13.07.2018 PASSED IN C.C.NO.167/2018 (CRIME NO.107/2018
MUDDEBIHAL
POLICE
STATION)
TAKING
COGNIZANCE
AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE
UNDER SECTIONS 171H OF IPC AND SECTION 3 OF THE
KARNATAKA OPEN PLACES (PREVENTION OF DISFIGUREMENT)
ACT, 1981.
THIS PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED
FOR
ORDERS
ON
12.11.2021,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRONOUNCEMENT,
THIS
DAY,
THE
COURT
MADE
THE
FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners and the learned High Court Government
Pleader appearing for the respondent-State.
2.
This petition is filed under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C., praying this Court to quash the order of the Civil
Judge and JMFC, Muddebihal, dated 13.07.2018 passed
in C.C.No.167/2018 (Crime No.107/2018 of Muddebihal
Police Station) taking cognizance against the petitioners
3
for the offences punishable under Section 171H of IPC
and Section 3 of the Karnataka Open Places (Prevention
of Disfigurement) Act, 1981 (for short ‘the Act’).
3.
Factual matrix of the case is that the
complaint is lodged by one Basavaraj stating that he
was deputed for election duty on the eve of assembly
elections during the year 2018. He was performing
flying squad duty in Muddebihal Assembly constituency
along with other officials by forming six teams on
20.04.2018. It is also alleged that a candidate
belonging to Indian National Congress had come to
Tahsildar office, Muddebihal, for filing nomination papers
and some vehicles had accompanied him to Tahsildar’s
office displaying stickers containing symbol and flag of
Indian National Congress. It is further alleged that he
along with his team members inspected the said vehicles
and noticed that stickers displaying palm symbol of
Indian
National
Congress
was
displayed
on
the
4
motorcycle and flags of Indian National Congress were
tied to Bolero vehicle and Tata Ace vehicle. It is also
alleged that the same was done without any permission
and they have violated the Election Code of Conduct.
Hence, the case has been registered, the police have
investigated the matter and filed charge sheet.
4.
The learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners would vehemently contend that first of all,
Act invoked i.e., the Karnataka Open Places (Prevention
of Disfigurement) Act, 1981 is not applicable to
Muddebihal and the said Act is applicable only in respect
of particular places. Unless the same is notified in
respect of particular place of Muddebihal, the police
ought not to have initiated proceedings against the
petitioners under Section 3 of the Act. The learned
counsel also submits that the respondents have also
invoked Section 171H of IPC. The complaint is not filed
under Section 195 of Cr.P.C., but the case has been
5
registered against the petitioners and based on the
police report, cognizance was also taken. The learned
counsel also would submit that when non-cognizable
offence is invoked, it requires permiss