BENCH AT KALBURAGI
SHARANAPPA S/O RUDRAPPA ANGADI – Appellant
Versus
RAMAPPA S/O HANUMAPPA AND ORS – Respondent
These two captioned appeal are filed by the
defendant
No.7
and
defendant
No.8/purchasers
questioning the preliminary decree passed by the both
Courts in a partition suit.
2. For the sake of brevity, the ranks of the
parties are referred as they are ranked before the
Trial Court.
3.
The geological tree of the family is as
under;
Ramappa
|
Amrappa Maddikar (D.1)
___________________________|____________________________
|
|
| | | |
Adappa Mahadevappa Hanmappa Yellappa Mallamma Huligemma
(adopted (D.2)
| (D.3) (D.4) (D.5)
By Balingappa
Parmamma (P.6)
Maddikar)
|
__________________________________________
| | | | |
Ramappa Sharnappa Sahadevappa Sampamma Sharada
(P.1) (P.2) (P.3) (P.4) (P.5)
4. The plaintiffs, who represent the branch of
Hanmappa, filed a suit for partition alleging that
defendant No.2, who is managing the ancestral
10
properties, declined to give share in the yield
generated from the ancestral properti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.