SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BENCH AT KALBURAGI
SHARANAPPA S/O RUDRAPPA ANGADI – Appellant
Versus
RAMAPPA S/O HANUMAPPA AND ORS – Respondent


These two captioned appeal are filed by the

defendant

No.7

and

defendant

No.8/purchasers

questioning the preliminary decree passed by the both

Courts in a partition suit.

2. For the sake of brevity, the ranks of the

parties are referred as they are ranked before the

Trial Court.

3.

The geological tree of the family is as

under;

Ramappa

|

Amrappa Maddikar (D.1)

___________________________|____________________________

|

|

| | | |

Adappa Mahadevappa Hanmappa Yellappa Mallamma Huligemma

(adopted (D.2)

| (D.3) (D.4) (D.5)

By Balingappa

Parmamma (P.6)

Maddikar)

|

__________________________________________

| | | | |

Ramappa Sharnappa Sahadevappa Sampamma Sharada

(P.1) (P.2) (P.3) (P.4) (P.5)

4. The plaintiffs, who represent the branch of

Hanmappa, filed a suit for partition alleging that

defendant No.2, who is managing the ancestral

10

properties, declined to give share in the yield

generated from the ancestral properti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top