BENCH AT KALBURAGI
SHASHIKANT @ PINTYA S/O TIRTHAPPA HADAPAD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
The learned High Court Government Pleader has filed
objections. The same is taken on record.
2.
The petitioner has filed this petition under
Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking to enlarge him on bail in
Crime No.77/2023 of Sub-Urban Police Station, for the
offence punishable under Section 395 of Indian Penal
Code, 1860 (for short, 'IPC').
3.
Brief facts leading rise to filing of this petition
are as under:
The case of the prosecution is that on 13.03.2023
Sadik has filed written complaint against the accused Anil
Pujari and others and on the basis of the said complaint,
the police have registered the case in Crime No.77/2023
for the offence punishable under Section 395 of IPC. It is
alleged that the complainant is having a house in Bijapur
- 3 -
and gave the said house to accused No.1 Anil Pujari and
Anil Pujari and his wife were residing in the said house on
rent basis and they used to pay rent of Rs.5,000/-. They
have paid Rs.5,000/- as advance while taking house on
rent and thereafter, accused No.1 did not pay rent. The
wife of the accused No.1 alone was residing in the house.
Therefore, the complainant removed them from the house.
Thereafter, the accused No.1 and his wife w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.