SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BENCH AT KALBURAGI
SHASHIKANT @ PINTYA S/O TIRTHAPPA HADAPAD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


The learned High Court Government Pleader has filed

objections. The same is taken on record.

2.

The petitioner has filed this petition under

Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking to enlarge him on bail in

Crime No.77/2023 of Sub-Urban Police Station, for the

offence punishable under Section 395 of Indian Penal

Code, 1860 (for short, 'IPC').

3.

Brief facts leading rise to filing of this petition

are as under:

The case of the prosecution is that on 13.03.2023

Sadik has filed written complaint against the accused Anil

Pujari and others and on the basis of the said complaint,

the police have registered the case in Crime No.77/2023

for the offence punishable under Section 395 of IPC. It is

alleged that the complainant is having a house in Bijapur

- 3 -

and gave the said house to accused No.1 Anil Pujari and

Anil Pujari and his wife were residing in the said house on

rent basis and they used to pay rent of Rs.5,000/-. They

have paid Rs.5,000/- as advance while taking house on

rent and thereafter, accused No.1 did not pay rent. The

wife of the accused No.1 alone was residing in the house.

Therefore, the complainant removed them from the house.

Thereafter, the accused No.1 and his wife w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top