1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G. UMA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200603/2022
BETWEEN:
1.
YARRA SWAMI S/O SITHRAMAPPA,
AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O 3-2-151/1 NEAR VEERBADRESHWAR TEMPLE,
BEROON QILLA, RAICHUR,
TQ: & DIST: RAICHUR-584123.
2.
SMT. NAGAMMA W/O YARESWAMI NAYKA,
AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O 3-2-151/1 NEAR VEERBADRESHWAR TEMPLE,
BEROON QILLA, RAICHUR,
TQ: & DIST: RAICHUR-584123.
3.
BHEEMESH S/O SALI BASSANNA,
AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O ALKUR VILLAGE, NOW AT HANCHINAL,
RAICHUR, TQ: & DIST: RAICHUR-584123.
4.
NARASHIMLU NAYAK S/O BENAKAYYA,
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O BAPUR VILLAGE, RAICHUR,
TQ: & DIST: RAICHUR-584123.
5.
DULLAYYA NAYAKA S/O YALLAPPA NAYAKA,
AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O L.K. DODDI VILLAGE,
RAICHUR, TQ: & DIST: RAICHUR-584123.
6.
URUKUNDA NAYAK S/O DODDA NARASHIMLU,
AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O BAPUR VILLAGE, RAICHUR.
TQ: & DIST: RAICHUR-584123.
2
7.
RAMAPPA NAYAK S/O MUKAYYA NAYAK,
AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O NEW MALLAYYABAD, RAICHUR,
TQ: & DIST: RAICHUR-584123.
8.
EARANNA NAYAK S/O BHEEMAYYA NAYAK,
AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O ANWAR VILLAGE, RAICHUR,
TQ: & DIST: RAICHUR-584123.
9.
THIMMAPPA NAYAK S/O AYYANNA NAYAK,
AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O ALKUR VILLAGE, RAICHUR,
TQ: & DIST: RAICHUR-584123.
10.
THIMAPPA KURUBARU S/O HANUMANTHA,
AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O BAPUR VILLAGE, RAICHUR,
TQ. & DIST: RAICHUR-584123.
… PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY ADDL. SPP,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH,
(THROUGH RAICHUR WEST P.S.,
DIST: RAICHUR-585123.
2.
SHARNA GOUDA S/O ASHEPPA VADIGERI,
AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O H.NO.ES-2, HRB LAYOUT,
RAICHUR, TQ: & DIST: RAICHUR-584123.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. GURURAJ V. HASILKAR, HCGP FOR R1;
BY SRI. SUDARSHAN.M, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C.,
PRAYING TO QUASH THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS IN S.C.NO.72/2021
(CRIME NO.46/2019) FOR OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/SECS.143, 147, 148,
307, 323, 504, 506, 427, 447, R/W 149 IPC REGISTERED BY RAICHUR WEST
P.S. WHICH IS NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF LEARNED PRL. SESSIONS
JUDGE AT RAICHUR.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
3
The petitioners being accused Nos.1 to 10 in Crime
No.46/2019 of Raichur West Police Station, are before this
Court invoking inherent powers of this Court under Section
482
of
Cr.P.C.,
to
quash
the
proceedings
in
S.C.No.72/2021 (Crime No.46/2019) for the offences
punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 307, 323, 504,
506, 427, 447 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal
Code (for short ‘IPC’), pending on the file of learned
Principal Sessions Judge, Raichur.
2.
Brief facts of the case are that the informant-
Sharanagowda Vadigeri lodged the first information with
Raichur West Police Station against accused Nos.1 to 3 and
others alleging the commission of offence punishable under
Sections 143, 147, 148, 307, 323, 504, 506, 427, 447
read with Section 149 of IPC. It is stated that on
03.05.2019, at about 10:00 p.m., accused Nos.1 to 3
along with 8 to 10 persons with common object to commit
murder, armed with deadly weapons, illegally trespassed
4
into land belonging to the informant, where they were
constructing the compound wall. The accused have
demolished the said compound wall, which was under
construction and caused loss of Rs.3,00,000/- and have
tried to assault the informant with deadly weapons.
However, the informant escaped. In the meantime, the
accused have assaulted the laborers and caused minor
injuries. The accused have criminally intimidated the
informant and others. Accused No.1 was armed with a
knife and criminally intimidated to take away the life of the
information. Even though he tried to stab the informant,
some how he escaped from him. Therefore, the informant
requested the police to register the case and to initiate
legal action against the petitioners. Accordingly, police
registered the case and took up investigation.
3.
After investigation, charge sheet came to be
filed against accused Nos.1 to 10. The learned Magistrate
took cognizance of the offence and committed the matter
to the Principal District and Sessions Court, Raichur and
5
the matter is now pending in S.C.No.72/2021 for the
above said offences.
4.
Accused Nos.1 to 10 are the petitioners before
this Court seeking to quash criminal proceedings initiated
against them.
5.
When the matter was listed for orders,
Sri. Mahantesh Patil, learned counsel for the petitioners
and Sri. Sudarshan.M, learned counsel for respondent No.2
submitted that the parties have amicably settled their
dispute out of the Court and they have filed application
under Section 320 read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C.,
seeking permission to compound the offence and quash
the criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioners.
Accused No.1 has filed an affidavit in support of the
application which reads as under:
“AFFIDAVIT
I, Yarra Swami S/o Sithramappa, Age: 50
Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o3-2-151/1 Near
Veerbadreshwar Temple, Beroon Qilla, Raichur,
Tq: & Dist: Raichur, today at Kalaburagi, do
6
hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as
under.
That, I am the petitioner No.1 in this case.
I know the facts of the case. I am authorized to
swear this affidavit on behalf of the other
petitioners. Hence, I am swearing this affidavit.
That,
due
to
intervention
of
family
members, elderly persons of the village, and
well wishers of our respective family, the
Accused/petitioners
and
respondent
No.2/complainant settled the dispute between
them
and
arrived
amicable
settlement.
Accordingly, the respondent No.2 and the
Accused/petitioners
filed
joint
compromise
petition. Hence, in view of the settlement the
petitioners filed this petition for quashing the
pending criminal proceedings against us in
S.C.No.72/2021 before the Prl. Sessions Judge
at Raichur. Under these circumstances, the
continuation of criminal proceedings, would put
us to great oppression, prejudice and extreme
injustice would be cause to us.
That, the petitioners and respondent No.2
herein are neighbors and known to each other
from several years. The dispute between us and
7
respondent No.2 is relating to compound