SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MUTTU AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P/200466/2018



Crl.P.No.200466/2018

C/w Crl.P.No.200478/2018

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

KALABURAGI BENCH

DATED THIS THE 22nd DAY OF JUNE, 2018

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200466/2018

C/w

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200478/2018

In Crl.P.No.200466/2018

BETWEEN:

1. Muttu S/o Shankar Yantman,

Age: 23 years, Occ: Agriculture,

2. Santosh S/o Galib Yantman,

Age: 19 years, Occ: Agriculture,

3. Bandenavaj S/o Lalsab Soudagar,

Age: 36 years, Occ: Agriculture,

All the petitioners are R/o Almel,

Tq: Sindagi, Dist: Vijayapura-586202.

... Petitioners

(By Sri R.S.Lagali, Advocate)

AND:

The State of Karnataka,

Through the PSI, Almel P.S.

Rep. by the Addl. State Public Prosecutor,

High Court of Karnataka,

Crl.P.No.200466/2018

C/w Crl.P.No.200478/2018

2

Kalaburagi Bench-585102.

... Respondent

(By Sri Mallikarjun Sahukar, HCGP)

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of

Cr.P.C. praying to allow the petition and thereby release

the petitioners on bail in Criminal Case No.63/2018

(arising out of Almel P.S., Crime No.39/2018) pending on

the file of Senior Civil Judge & JMFC Court, Sindagi for the

offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of IPC.

In Crl.P.No.200478/2018

BETWEEN:

1. Bhimu S/o Yallappa Harijan,

Age: 38 years, Occ: Agriculture,

2. Shrikant S/o Hajappa Bommanahalli,

Age: 32 years, Occ: Agriculture,

Both are R/o Almel, Sindagi Taluka,

Dist: Vijayapura-586101.

... Petitioners

(By Sri Shivanand V. Pattanshetti, Advocate)

AND:

The State of Karnataka

R/by Addl. SPP,

Kalaburagi Bench-585106

(Through Almel P.S.

Dist: Vijayapur)

... Respondent

(By Sri Mallikarjun Sahukar, HCGP)

Crl.P.No.200466/2018

C/w Crl.P.No.200478/2018

3

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of

Cr.P.C.

praying

to

grant

the

regular

bail

to

the

petitioners/accused Nos.5 and 6 in C.C.No.63/2018 (Almel

P.S. Crime No.39/2018) for the offences punishable under

Sections 399 and 402 of IPC pending on the file of JMFC

Court at Sindagi, Dist: Vijayapur.

These petitions are coming on for orders this day,

the Court made the following:

ORDER

Heard.

2.

Since these two petitions arise out of the

same crime number, they are taken-up for disposal by

this common order.

3.

Petitioners in Crl.P.No.200466/2018 are

accused

No.2

to

4

and

petitioners

in

Crl.P.No.200478/2018 are accused Nos.5 and 6 in

Crime No.39/2018 of Almel Police Station. Aleml Police

charge sheeted the petitioners and the first accused in

the said case for the offences punishable under

Sections 399 and 403 IPC on the complaint of CW.1 –

Crl.P.No.200466/2018

C/w Crl.P.No.200478/2018

4

Anilkumar, the Police Sub-Inspector of Almel Police

Station.

4.

It is alleged that on

03.02.2018

at

00.45 hours near Bommanahalli Cross of Almel

Devangao road, the accused were found making

preparations for committing dacoity and were armed

with iron rods, clubs, rope and chilly power in the

Bolero Jeep No.KA-28-NC-8294. It is alleged that the

said vehicle and the weapons were seized under the

mahazar by the police squad.

5.

The maximum punishment prescribed for

the

offence

is

10

years

imprisonment.

The

incriminating materials are already seized. However so

far as accused Nos.2, 3 and 5 it is submitted that they

are

involved

in

another

case

for

the

offence

punishable under Section 307 IPC. Accused Nos.2 and

3 are charge sheeted in the Crime No.131/2017 of

Almel Police Station for the offence punishable under

Crl.P.No.200466/2018

C/w Crl.P.No.200478/2018

5

Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act also along with

Section 307 IPC.

6.

All the accused are said to be rowdy

sheeters of Almel Police Station. Having regard to the

fact that accused Nos.2 and 3 were involved in a case

under the Arms Act, it is not a fit case to grant bail to

them.

7.

So far as the other petitioners since

investigation is already concluded they can be granted

bail

with

suitable

conditions.

Therefore,

Crl.P.No.200466/2018

is

partly

allowed

and

Crl.P.No.200478/2018 is allowed.

8.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top