SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - KALABURAGI BEN
PRABHUGOUD.B.TUMBIGI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR – Respondent
WP 205728 2016



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

KALABURAGI BENCH

DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE Dr.JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY

WRIT PETITION NO.205728/2016 (LA-RES)

BETWEEN:

PRABHUGOUD B.TUMBIGI

S/O B.G. TUMBIGI

AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

MADIKESHWAR MUDDEBIHAL TALUKA

BIJAPUR DISTRICT-586116

PRESENTLY AT NO.12/8

KRISHNA ENCLAVE, 2ND CROSS

NEHRU NAGAR, BANGALORE-560020

... PETITIONER

(BY SRI VEERANAGOUDA MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

REVENUE DEPARTMENT

VIDHANA SOUDHA

BENGALURU-560001

2.

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

KBJNL ALMATTI

BIJAPUR DISTRICT-586201

... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI SHIVAKUMAR R. TENGLI, AGA FOR R1;

NOTICE TO R2 SERVED)

W.P.No.205728/2016

2

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT

THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO PAY THE IRRIGATED

LANDS COMPENSATION TO THE LANDS BEARING SURVEY

NUMBERS

210

AND

208/2

MADIKESHWAR

VILLAGE,

MUDDEBIHAL TALUKA, BIJAPUR DISTRICT BY MODIFYING THE

ORDER NO. ULLEKHA AITIRPU KRAMANK KAM.E/BHOO.SWA-

1/CR-75/15-16/4511

DATED

01.03.2016

AND

ULLEKHA

AITIRPU

KRAMANK

KAM.E/BHOO.SWA-1/CR-75/15-16/4511

DATED 01.03.2016 VIDE ANNEXURES-G AND H.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING

IN

'B'

GROUP

THROUGH

PHYSICAL/VIDEO

CONFERENCING HEARING, THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE

FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.1

are physically present in the Court. Learned counsel

for the petitioner submits that since he has alternative

and efficacious remedy which he intends to exhaust,

he would not press the writ petition.

2.

Learned Additional Government Advocate

submits his no objection for the same.

W.P.No.205728/2016

3

3.

In view of the submission made by the

learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition

stands disposed of as withdrawn to enable the writ

petitioner to exhaust the alternative remedy available

to him.

Sd/-

JUDGE

VNR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top