1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.200129/2015
BETWEEN:
NAGAPPA S/O SIDDAPPA BABANAGAR
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER,
R/O MARAKABBANALLI VILLAGE,
TQ. B.BAGEWADI, DIST. VIJAYAPUR
… APPELLANT
(BY SRI S.S. MAMADAPUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGHER COURT BUILDING,
CIRCUIT BENCH, GULBARGA.
(BASAVAN BAGEWADI P.S.)
2.
AMOGEPPA
S/O HANAMANTHAPPA BISANAL
AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE
R/O BOMMANAHALLI,
TQ. B. BAGEWADI,
DIST. VIJAYAPUR-586115
(AMENDED V/O DATED 07.07.2022)
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI GURURAJ V. HASILKAR, HCGP FOR R1;
R2-SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 374(2)
CR.P.C.,
PRAYING
TO
SET
ASIDE
THE
OF
R
2
CONVICTION AND ORDER OF SENTENCE DATED 14.10.2015
PASSED BY THE LEARNED II-ADDITIONAL SESSIONS AND
SPECIAL
JUDGE,
VIJAYAPUR,
IN
SPECIAL
POCSO
CASE
NO.32/2014 AND ACQUIT THE APPELLANT OF THE AFORESAID
OFFENCES.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Heard Sri S.S.Mamadapur, learned counsel for
the appellant and Sri Gururaj V. Hasilkar, learned High
Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1.
The present appeal is directed against the
judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed
in Special POCSO Case No.32/2014 on the file of II-
Additional Sessions and Special Judge, Vijayapur,
dated 14.10.2015.
3.
Facts in brief for disposal of the present
appeal are as under:
3
Case of the prosecution reveals that the victim
girl aged about 14 years, was acquainted with the
accused and he lured and kidnapped her and took her
to Asta village in Sangli District, where aunt of the
accused by name Smt. Seetabai had a house. In the
said house, the accused kept the victim girl for a
period of 15 days and everyday, he had forcible
sexual intercourse with her. Subsequently, she was
kept in another relative’s home at Tadalagi and
accused had forcible sexual intercourse with her.
The chargesheet papers reveal that the victim
girl was restored to the custody of her parents and
thereafter, her statement was recorded and the
chargesheet came to be filed for the offences
punishable under Sections 363 and 376 of IPC and
Section 5(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual
Offences Act, 2012, (for short, hereinafter referred to
as ‘POCSO Act’). During the course of investigation,
4
the accused was apprehended and he was sent to
judicial custody.
4.
On receipt of chargesheet, the learned
Special Judge took cognizance for the aforesaid
offences and secured the presence of the accused and
after complying Section 207 of Cr.P.C., framed
charges. The accused pleaded not guilty and
therefore, the trial was held.
5.
In
order
to
prove
the
case
of
the
prosecution, in all, 14 witnesses were examined on
behalf of the prosecution as PWs.1 to 14 and 23
documentary evidence were relied upon by the
prosecution which were exhibited and marked as
Exs.P1 to P23. The documentary evidence were
comprised
of
spot
panchanama,
photographs,
complaint, medical report of the accused, victim’s
birth
certificate,
admission
register,
admission
5
application, transfer certificate, requisition of PSI,
statement
under
Section
164
of
Cr.P.C.,
FIR,
statement of witnesses, case sheet, MLC register,
extracts of MLC register, statements of PWs.12 and 13
and house extract.
6.
On conclusion of recording of the evidence
on behalf of the prosecution, the statement of the
accused as contemplated under Section 313 of
Cr.P.C., was recorded by the learned Special Judge.
In the said statement, the accused did not offer any
explanation of whatsoever for the alleged incident
except denying all the incriminating circumstances.
The accused did not choose to file any written
statement as is contemplated under Section 313(5) of
Cr.P.C., nor adduced any defence evidence to rebut
the presumption available to the prosecution under
Sections 29 and 30 of the POCSO Act.
6
7.
Thereafter, the learned Special Judge heard
the parties in detail and formulated two points and
holding the said points in the affirmative, passed an
order of conviction convicting the accused for the
offences punishable under Section 363 of IPC and
Section 5(1) of the POCSO Act punishable under
Section 6 of the POCSO Act and passed the sentence
as under:
“Accused is hereby sentenced to
undergo
rigorous
imprisonment
of
7
(seven) years for the offence punishable
U/s.363 of IPC and shall pay a fine of
Rs.5,000/-. In default of payment of fine,
he shall undergo simple imprisonment for a
period of 1½ months.
Further,
the
accused
is
hereby
sentenced
to
undergo
rigorous
imprisonment for a period of 10 (ten) years
for the offence punishable Sec.5(1) of
Protection of Child
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.