HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - KALABURAGI BEN
M/S ITC LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
FOOD SAFETY INSPECTOR – Respondent
WP 207484 2015
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
WRIT PETITION NO.207484/2015 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
M/s. ITC Limited
No.37, Jawaharlal Nehru Road
Kolkata – 700071
Through its authorized representative
Shri Murali Ganesan
Vice President – Finance, Foods Business
Division, ITC Limited, At No.18, Banaswadi
Main Road, Maruthiseva Nagar
Bengalore - 560005
… Petitioner
(By Sri Uday Holla, Senior Advocate for
Sri Shivashankar H. Manur, Advocate)
AND:
1.
Food Safety Inspector
Department of the Food Safety
And Standards, Vijayapura
Vijayapura District-586101
2.
Designated Officer
Department of the Food Safety
And Standards, Vijayapura
2
Vijayapura District-586101
… Respondents
(By Sri Gururaj V. Hasilkar, HCGP)
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C.
praying to issue a writ of certiorari or any other
appropriate writ or order or direction quashing the order
dated 25.11.2015 passed in C.C.No.307/037/226/2015-16
on
the
file
of
Additional
District
Magistrate
cum
Adjudicating Authority, Vijayapura (Annexure-A) and issue
any other appropriate writ, order or direction as this Court
may deem fit.
This writ petition having been heard and reserved for
Orders on 15.07.2021, coming on for ‘Pronouncement of
Orders’ this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this petition under Article
226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482
of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 25.11.2015
passed in C.C.No.307/037/226/2015-16 on the file of
Additional
District
Magistrate
cum
Adjudicating
Authority, Vijayapura.
3
2.
The factual matrix leading to the case are
that the petitioner is a Company within the meaning of
Companies Act, 2013 and is manufacturing and
marketing
several
variants
products
including
Sunfeast Yippee Noodles viz., Classic Masala, Magic
Masala and Chinese Masala. It is alleged that accused
No.1
was
a
distributor
of
the
food
packets
manufactured by the present petitioner. It is also
alleged that on 11.06.2015, the complainant has
suspected that Sunfeast Yippee Noodles Magic Masala
is adulterated and thereafter he has approached
accused No.1 and purchased a packet by issuing Form
No.V-A for Rs.376.01 paisa and obtained a receipt. It
is alleged that thereafter a mahazar was also drawn at
the spot. Subsequently, one sample was sent to
Divisional Food Laboratory at Belgaum and on
23.06.2015, the report of the Chemical Expert was
received,
wherein,
it
is
submitted
that
it
is
4
‘misbranded’.
Thereafter,
on
10.08.2015,
the
complainant has issued notice to accused No.1
seeking details of the owner and storer of the
misbranded products and the said information was
provided on 17.07.2015. It is alleged that on
10.08.2015, the complainant has reported to accused
No.1 that he can get tested the second sample out of
four samples to any other lab and get it tested by
paying requisite necessary fees as per Rule 2.4.(6) of
the
Food
Safety
and
Standards
Rules,
2011.
However, accused No.1 has reported that he is not
interested in this regard and thereafter a prosecution
was made before a Designated Officer i.e., Additional
District Commissioner/Magistrate, Vijayapur. The
present petitioner was accused No.3 and he has filed
objections contending that the complaint copy was not
furnished to him and no reasons were given by the
Food Analyst as to what is the reason for holding
5
sample as ‘misbranded’. Further, it is also alleged
that before taking sample, he was not given any
notice and it was not collected in his presence. The
sanction was also challenged and further it is alleged
that the Food Analyst Report itself discloses that it
complied all the requirements and without verificatio