- 1 -
WP No. 202734 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION NO. 202734 OF 2022 (CS-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. VIVEKANAND S/O GIREPPA BIRADAR,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC: SECRETARY,
PKPS NANDARGI, TQ. CHADACHAN,
DIST. VIJAYAPUR.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.I.R.BIRADAR., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION,
M.S.BUILDING,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU – 01.
2.
THE REGISTRAR OF
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
ALI ASKAR ROAD,
NEAR RAJ BHAVAN ROAD,
VASANT NAGAR, BENGALURU – 52.
3.
THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
BELAGAVI DIVISION, BELAGAVI,
NO.5, UDAYA BUILDING,
SPM ROAD, SHAHAPUR,
BELAGAVI – 590 001.
Digitally signed
by B NAGAVENI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
- 2 -
WP No. 202734 of 2022
4.
THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
VIJAYAPUR,
DIST. VIJAYAPUR – 586 101.
5.
THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
INDI, SUB-DIVISION, INDI,
DIST. VIJAYAPUR – 586 101.
6.
THE PRESIDENT,
PKPS, (PRATHAMIKA KRUSHI
PATTINA SAHAKAR SANGH)
NANDARGI, TQ. INDI,
DIST.VIJAYAPUR – 586 101.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SHIVAKUMAR R.TENGLI., AGA FOR R1-R5;
R6-SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN
RELIEFS.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Sri.I.R.Biradar., learned counsel for the petitioner and
Sri.Shivakumar R. Tengli., learned AGA for respondents 1 to
5 have appeared in person.
The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of
Certiorari to quash the order dated 08.09.2022 passed by
- 3 -
the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Vijayapura, -
fourth respondent vide Annexure-J and to quash the order
dated 09.02.2021 passed by the Assistant Registrar of Co-
operative Societies, Indi – fifth respondent vide Annexure-D.
The Writ of Mandamus is also sought to direct the fifth
respondent to re-do the inquiry under Section 64 of the
Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, and to direct
the President of Prathamika Krushi Pattina Shahakar Sangh -
sixth respondent to implement his letter/order dated
04.05.2022 vide Annexure-G2.
The society namely Prathamika Krushi Pattina Sahakar
Sangha, Indi is a registered society. The sixth respondent,
the President of the society made a certain allegation against
the petitioner about the misappropriation of funds of the
society during the years 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 while
sanctioning
loans
to
the
borrowers.
Hence,
inquiry
proceedings under Section 64 of the Karnataka Co-operative
Societies Act, 1959, were initiated. His grievance is that
inquiry proceedings are held behind his back. Though the
Inquiry Officer has recorded statements of the borrowers,
- 4 -
they are all in cyclostyle format; indeed, there is no
recording of the statements of the borrowers. On the basis
of the inquiry report, an order came to be passed on
09.02.2021 by the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative
Societies, (for short, hereinafter referred to as ‘ARCS’) Indi -
fifth respondent holding that the allegations are proved and
direction was issued to take action against the petitioner and
to recover a sum of Rs.2,85,93,550/- (Rupees Two Crores,
Eighty-Five Lakhs, Ninety-Three Thousand, Five Hundred and
Fifty Only) along with interest at 16% and also initiated
criminal action against the petitioner. The petitioner
challenged the order before the Deputy Registrar of Co-
operative Societies, (for short, hereinafter referred to as
‘DRCS’) Vijayapura, and the DRCS, Vijayapura, vide order
dated 08.09.2022 confirmed the order passed by the ARCS.
This order is called into question in this Writ Petition on
several grounds as set out in the memorandum of the Writ
Petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents
have urged several contentions.
- 5 -
Learned AGA submits that as per the directions of this
Court, the office of the Advocate General has secured the
records. He submits that before the DRCS, the matter was
listed on 09.06.2022 and the further date was given as
27.06.2022. However, the records show that no proceedings
were held on 27.06.2022. On the other hand, on
08.09.2022, the impugned order came to be passed
confirming the order passed by the ARCS. Hence, he
submits that the matter requires a remand. Therefore, he
submits that the order passed by the DRCS vide Annexure-J
may be quashed and the matter may be remitted to the
DRCS.
Learned AGA also submits that a memo has been filed
enclosing the order sheet maintained before the DRCS and
the same may be placed on record.
Submission is noted. Memo is placed on record.
- 6 -
Heard the contentions urged on behalf of the
respective parties and perused the Writ papers and also the
Annexures with utmost care.
I have also perused the copy of the order sheet
produced by the learned AGA which has been filed along with
the memo. A perusal of the same would depict that the case
was listed on 09.06.2022 and it was adjourned to
27.06.2022. Strangely, nothing happened on 27.06.2022,
and on one fine day i.e., on 08.09.2022, the case was called
and the impugned order came to be passed by the DRCS.
Hence, in my opinion, the matter requires a remand.
Therefore, I deem it appropriate to quash the order dated
08.09.2022
passed
by
the
DRCS,
Vijayapura,
vide
Annexure-J