HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CHAND PEERA S/O MOHAMMED GOUSE RAMALI INAMDAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P/201273/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
CRIMINAL PETITION No.201273/2021
Between:
Chand Peera
S/o Mohammed Gouse Ramali Inamdar
Aged about 46 years
R/at Nisar Maddi
Vijayapura - 586 109
… Petitioner
(By Sri Lakshmikanth G. &
Sri Sunil Kumar S., Advocates)
AND:
State of Karnataka by
Gol-Gumbaz P.S.
Represented by
Ld. State Public Prosecutor
High Court Building Complex
Kalaburagi - 585 103
… Respondent
(By Sri Gururaj V. Hasilkar, HCGP)
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of
Criminal
Procedure
Code,
praying
to
enlarge
the
petitioner/accused No.1 on bail in Crime No.31/2019 of
Gol-Gumbaz P.S. for offences punishable under Sections
2
143, 147, 148, 302 and 102(B) R/w 149 of IPC, now
pending on the file of IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge,
Vijayapura in S.C.No.124/2019 (Crime No.31/2019) on
such terms and conditions.
This petition coming on for Orders this day, the
Court made the following:
O R D E R
This petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by
accused No.1 to enlarge him on bail in Crime No.31/2019
of Gol-Gumbaz Police Station, Vijayapur, charge sheeted
for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148,
302, and 120(B) R/w Section 149 of IPC.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and
learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent-
State.
3.
Brief facts of the case are that, on 23.02. 2019
at 4.00 a.m., a police man came and informed the
complainant that her son is lying on the road near the
school building. She immediately went to the spot and
noticed her son lying down with grievous injuries all over
the body. She suspected that some miscreants might have
3
caused his death by assaulting him with lethal weapons.
On a complaint lodged by her, a case was registered at
Gol-Gumbaz Police Station in Crime No.31/2019 against
unknown persons.
4.
Learned counsel for petitioner has contended
that charge sheet has been filed against accused Nos.1 to
5 and all the accused except the petitioner herein, have
been enlarged on bail by this Court. He has annexed the
copies of the bail orders passed in respect of accused
Nos.2 to 5. He contends that there are no eyewitnesses to
the incident in question and with regard to recovery of
blood stained cloths and weapons, the same is done at the
instance of accused Nos.1 and 5. He submits that accused
No.5 has been enlarged on bail and therefore contends
that even the petitioner is entitled for the relief on the
ground of parity. He submits that petitioner was arrested
on 07.03.2019 and he is languishing in judicial custody
from the past two and half years. He submits that
4
petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions.
Accordingly, seeks to allow the petition.
5.
Learned High Court Government Pleader has
contended that petitioner and other accused persons have
committed the murder of complainant's son by name Abdul
Razak on 23.02.2019 at about 2.00 a.m. and thereafter
thinking that his brother by name Saleem would cause
harm to them, if he comes to know about his brother's
murder, went to his house and assaulted him with deadly
weapons
and
committed
his
murder.
He
therefore
contends that the offence committed by the petitioner is
heinous in nature. He further contends that there are blood
stained clothes and weapons recovered at the instance of
the petitioner. He submits that in view of the nature and
gravity of the offence committed, petitioner is not entitled
for the relief he has sought. Accordingly, seeks to reject
the petition.
6.
Accused Nos.1 to 4 came to be arrested on
07.03.2019
in
connection
with
Crime
No.50/2019
5
registered at Gandhichowk Police Station, Vijayapur. In
their
voluntary
statements,
they
confessed
about
commission of the offence in the present case.
7.
As per charge sheet, a