HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R.DEVDAS,RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
HASIMPEER RAJAKASAB ALAND AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS – Respondent
WA/200167/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R. DEVDAS
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
WRIT APPEAL NO.200167/2021 (LB)
BETWEEN:
1.
HASIMPEER RAJAKASAB ALAND
AGE 38 YEARS,
OCC: MUNICIPALITY MEMBER,
R/O: TEKIA GALLI, TIPPU SULTAN CIRCLE
SINDHAGI, TQ SINDHAGI
DIST VIJAYAPUR-586128
2.
SHRISHAIL S/O MALLAPPA BEERGOND
AGE 31 YEARS, OCC: MUNICIPALITY MEMBER,
R/O: WARD NO. 3,
PUJARI GALLI KANAKADAS CIRCLE,
SINDAGI, TQ SINDHAGI,
DIST: VIJAYAPUR 586128
3.
SMT. PRATIBHA W/O SHIVAKUMAR KALLUR
AGE 29 YEARS, OCC: MUNICIPALITY MEMBER,
R/O: VIDYANAGAR 4th CROSS, SINDHAGI
TQ: SINDHAGI, DIST VIJAYAPUR-586128
4.
SMT. TAHASIN BANU W/O ABID MULLA
AGE 40 YEARS,
OCC MUNICIPALITY MEMBER,
2
R/O: TEKIA GALLI,
TIPPU SULTAN CIRCLE, SINDHAGI
TQ SINDHAGI, DIST VIJAYAPUR-586128
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.JAYAKUMAR S.PATIL, SR.COUNSEL FOR
SRI.AMRESH S ROJA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATON
M.S BUILDING, BANGALORE-1,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
VIJAYAPUR-586101.
3.
THE TAHASILDAR
SINDHAGI, DIST VIJAYAPUR-586128.
4.
THE CHIEF OFFICER
CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,
SINDHAGI, DIST VIJAYAPUR-586128.
5.
H.R ALGUR
AGE 60 YEARS,
OCC: DISTRICT CONGRESS PRESIDENT,
R/O: CONGRESS OFFICE COURT ROAD,
VIJAYPUR-586101.
6.
SHARANAPPA S/O TIPPANNA SUNAGAR
AGE 64 YEARS,
OCC EX MLA SINDAGI
R/O: TIPPU SULTAN CIRCLE SINDAGI
TQ SINDHAGI, DIST VIJAYAPURA-586128.
….RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SHIVAKUMAR R.TENGLI, AGA FOR R1 TO R3
SRI. SANGANABASAVA B.PATILS, ADV. FOR R4
SRI. B.C.JAKA, ADV. FOR R5
SRI. SHIVAKUMAR KALLOOR, ADV. FOR R6 )
3
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S. 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED
IN WRIT PETITION NO. 201461/2021 DATED 04/10/2021, BY
ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
R.DEVDAS J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
R. DEVDAS J., (ORAL):
This intra-Court writ appeal is filed by the writ
petitioners whose challenge raised to the order of
disqualification dated 22.07.2021 passed by the
competent authority, Deputy Commissioner, was
rejected by the learned Single Judge.
2.
The appellants were elected as Councilors
to the City Municipal Council (for short ‘CMC’) Sindagi,
from the Indian National Congress (for short ‘INC’).
The election to the post of President and Vice-
President of CMC was held on 03.11.2020. It appears
4
that the appellants disobeyed the whip issued by the
party through the authorized person and cross voted
in favour of a candidate from Janata Dal (Secular).
Alleging the said disobedience, the respondent No.5-
District Congress President, lodged a complaint on
09.11.2020, with the Election Officer, to refer the
complaint to the Deputy Commissioner, for his
consideration and decision, under the provisions of the
Karnataka Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection)
Act,
1987
(for
short
‘the
Act’).
The
Deputy
Commissioner, having considered the material on
record, held that the appellants herein disobeyed the
whip issued by authorized person and consequently
passed an order disqualifying the appellants herein
from the membership of CMC.
3.
Learned
Senior
Counsel
Sri.Jayakumar
S.Patil, appearing for the appellants draws attention of
5
this Court to a decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court
in the case of Sadashiv H.Patil Vs. Vithal D.Teke
and Others, (2000) 8 SCC 82, to contend that the
declaration of law has been reiterated by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court having regard to the consequences
that befall an elected member of the local body that it
is not only on the elected member but also on the
constituency represented by him, which would seize to
be represented on account of his hav