GOPINATHAKURUP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
The petitioner is the complainant in a
prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act. The counsel engaged by him to file
the complaint had relinquished the matter whereupon
he engaged another counsel who passed away at the
time of hearing. The present counsel is engaged only
at the time of hearing. The petitioner could not
produce the acknowledgment card of the receipt of
lawyer notice by the accused, though he produced
lawyer notice as well as the receipt of sending lawyer
notice through registered post. The defence of the
accused is that he has not received the lawyer notice
and the address shown as that of the accused is not
the correct address. The petitioner filed application
seeking to re-open the evidence under Section 311 of
the Cr.P.C.to produce a lawyer notice sent on behalf of
the wife of the accused showing the address of the wife
3
of the accused as that of the address of the accused
shown in the complaint as well as in the lawyer notice
in the impugned case. The court below rejected the
application by Annexure-V order on the short reason
that no reason is shown by the petitioner as to what
prevented him from producing
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.