SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 4128

T.V.NARAYANAN – Appellant
Versus
PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY – Respondent


Advocates:
['JACOB SEBASTIAN', '', 'SRI K V WINSTON', 'SMT ANU JACOB', 'SRI T C SURESH MENON']

Petitioner and his wife are the owners in possession

of an extent of 8 cents of land situate in old Survey

No.2890/3, within the limits of the 1st

respondent,

Municipality. According to the petitioner, petitioner has

secured Ext.P2 permission from the Revenue Divisional

Officer as early as in 29.5.1992, for utilization of the

property for other purposes, other than paddy cultivation

and agricultural operations. Even though a compound wall

was constructed and the land was developed, construction of

the residential building could not be carried out, since

the petitioner was away in connection with the employment.

Anyhow, the property was included in the data bank,

constituted as per the provisions of the Kerala

Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 (for

short, 'the Act, 2008').

2.

Thereupon petitioner has submitted an application

seeking removal of the property from data bank and has

secured Ext.P4 judgment dated 6.7.2018 from this Court,

directing the Local Level Monitoring Committee to consider

the said application. Thereafter, the Local Level

Monitoring Committee considered the said application and

has decided as per

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top