SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 41191

ABDUL LATHEEF – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


O R D E R

As the accused in these three anticipatory bail applications is the same person, as the defacto complainant is also the same and as the allegations are interlinked, these cases are disposed of on the basis of this common order.

2. B.A.No.199/2020 arises out of Crime No.90/2018 of Kuzhalmannam Police Station, which has been registered on the basis of the complaint of the lady defacto complainant alleging offences punishable under Sec.367(2)(n) of the I.P.C., Secs.7 & 8 of the POCSO Act, Secs. 66E & 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The allegations in the said crime are to the effect that the applicant accused had sexually abused the lady defacto complainant for a long time since 2013 and he had forcefully obtained her nude photographs & video clippings and blackmailed and intimidated her under the threat of uploading her obscene pictures in social media and subjected her forcible sexual inter course, etc. Further that he had also sexually abused her two minor daughters, aged 14 and 11 years and he had also sent nude photographs of the lady defacto complainant to her husband and her friends causing extreme mental agony to her.

3. B.A.No.201/2020 arises out of Crime

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top