HIGH COURT OF KERALA
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, J
DILEEP M.M. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl./2944/2018
Bail - Anticipatory Bail - CrPC Section 438 - The court granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC, interpreting the severity of injuries and lack of criminal antecedents as grounds for approval. Conditions for bail were set to ensure cooperation and prevent interference with the investigation.
Fact of the Case:
The applicants sought anticipatory bail for involvement in a crime involving allegations of unlawful assembly and assault, with claims that they were armed and caused injuries, which were later deemed minor.
Issues: Whether anticipatory bail should be granted based on the nature of the allegations and the severity of injuries caused.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of evaluating the severity of injuries and the accused's criminal history in granting anticipatory bail, leading to the conclusion that immediate custodial interrogation was unwarranted.
Final Decision: Anticipatory bail was granted to all applicants with specific conditions.
ORDER
1.This application is filed by the applicants under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking anticipatory bail in connection with the FIR, being Crime No.413 of 2018, registered with Ollur Police Station, for offence punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324 and 308 r/w Sec. 149 of the IPC. They have been arrayed as the accused No.1 to 7 in the said crime.
2.On 5.4.2018 at about 7.45 p.m., the accused are alleged to have wrongfully restrained the de facto complainant and others and attacked them with weapons causing injuries.
3.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants submitted that the allegations levelled against them are false and frivolous. Though it is alleged that accused Nos.1 & 2 were armed with weapons, no serious injuries were sustained.
4.The learned public prosecutor has very emphatically opposed the submissions. He has made available the case diary.
Having gone through the case diary, it does not appear to me that any serious injuries were sustained by the victim. The injuries sustained are only minor abrasions. It is not reported that the applicants are persons with criminal antecedents.
5.After considering the nature and gravity of the allegations, the the severity of injuries inflicted, the antecedents and attendant facts, it does not appear that custodial interrogation of the applicants is warranted in the instant case.
6.In the result, this application will stand allowed. The applicants shall appear before the investigation officer within ten days from today and shall undergo interrogation. Thereafter, if they are proposed to be arrested, they shall be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees forty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum. The above order shall be subject to the following conditions:
i)The applicants shall co-operate with the investigation and shall appear before the Investigating Officer on all Saturdays between 9 a.m. and 10 a.m., for one month or till final report is filed, whichever is earlier.
ii)The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/ her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.
iii)The applicants shall not commit any similar offence while on bail.
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation, if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.