2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 3777
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
FRIDAY ,THE 08TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1940
OP (CAT).No. 28 of 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER IN OA 757/2017 OF CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE
TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH DATED 30-08-2018
PETITIONER:
THE UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,DHOLPUR HOUSE,
SHAJAHAN ROAD,NEW DELHI-110069.
BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL
RESPONDENTS:
1
DR.JAI SINGH MEENA, AGED 49 YEARS,
S/O SRI M.L.MEENA DEPUTY DIRECTOR(PROCESSING AND
MARKETING),
PRESENTLY HOLDING CHARGE OF DIRECTOR,
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FISHERIES POST HARVEST
TECHNOLOGY AND TRAINING,
KOCHI-682016, RESIDING AT QTRS.NO.4,NIFPHATT
OFFICERS LIVING CENTRE,KOCHI-682016.
2
THE UNION OF INDIA,
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF
INDIA,MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE,DEPARTMENT OF
ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND DAIRYING,KRISHI BHAVAN,
NEW DELHI-110001.
3
THE DIRECTOR,
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FISHERIES POST HARVEST
TECHNOLOGY AND TRAINING,KOCHI-682016.
OP (CAT).No. 28 of 2019 2
4
SRI.MITHILESH KUMAR CHOUKSEY,
CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF FISHERIES EDUCATOIN,ICAR,
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE,
PANCH MARG,OFF YARI ROAD,VERSOVA,ANDHERI(W),
MUMBAI-400061.
BY ADV. SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR
SRI P. VIJAYAKUMAR-SCGC
THIS OP (CAT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30.1.2019, THE COURT
ON 8.3.2019 PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
OP (CAT).No. 28 of 2019 3
“C.R”
V.G.Arun, J.
This Original Petition is filed by the Union Public
Service Commission, the 2nd respondent in the Original
Application filed by the 1st respondent herein. The Original
Application was filed seeking to quash Annexure-A9 Office
Memorandum, by which the 4th respondent was appointed
as Director of the National Institute of Fisheries Post
Harvest Technology and Training (NIFPHATT), Kochi under
the Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Animal
Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries. The Government of
India had, as per Annexure-A2 Circular dated 11.8.2016,
invited applications to fill up the post of Director in the
NIFPHATT from candidates possessing the requisite
qualification, which are as under:-
“Composite
method:
Deputation
(including Short-term Contract) Plus
Promotion:
I. Officers under the Central Government
or State Governments or Union Territories
or Agricultural Universities or Recognized
Research Institutes or Councils or Semi-
Government or Autonomous Bodies and
Statutory Organizations:-
(a)(i) Holding analogous post on
OP (CAT).No. 28 of 2019 4
regular basis in the parent cadre or
department: or
(ii) with five years' service in the
grade rendered after appointment thereto
on a regular basis in the scale of pay of
Rs.15,600-39,100 with Grade Pay of
Rs.6600 (Pre-revised scale of pay of
Rs.10,000-15,200) or equivalent in the
parent cadre or department, and
(b)
Possessing
the
following
educational qualifications and experience:
Essential:
(I) Post Graduate Degree in Zoology
or Marine Biology or Oceanography or
Industrial Fisheries or Fisheries Science or
Chemistry or Bio-Chemistry or Food
Technology of a recognized University or
Institute or equivalent;
or
Post Graduate Diploma in Fisheries Science
from Central Institute of Fisheries
Education, Mumbai or equivalent;
(ii)Possessing seven years experience
in Managerial Capacity or Fish Processing
Technology
including
five
years
Administrative Experience in a Managerial
Capacity in a concern.
Desirable:
Ph.D in Fish Processing technology and quality assurance.
II. The Departmental Deputy Director
(Processing and Marketing) in the scale of
pay of Rs.15600-39100 with Grade Pay of
Rs.6600(Pre-revised scale of pay of
Rs.10,000-15,200) with five years regular
service in the grade and possessing
qualifications at (b)(i) above shall also be
considered along with outsiders and in
case he or she is selected for appointment
to the post, the same shall be deemed to
OP (CAT).No. 28 of 2019 5
have been filled on promotion.
2. The applicant, who had the requisite qualification
and was holding the charge of Director at the time of
issuance of the Notification, submitted his application
through proper channel. The 4th respondent, who was
working as the Chief Technical Officer, Central Institute of
Fisheries Education, Mumbai also submitted his application
and was selected for appointment to the notified post, on
the basis of the recommendation of the UPSC. The applicant
challenged the selection and appointment of the 4th
respondent on the ground that the 4th respondent does not
possess the requisite experience of 7 years in Fish
Processing or Fish Processing Technology including 5 years
Administrative Experience in a Managerial Capacity. It was
also contended that the 4th respondent did not possess the
desirable qualifications of Ph.D in Fish Processing
Technology and Quality Assurance mentioned in Annexure-
A2. It was contended that the 4th respondent had acquired
Ph.D in Migration and Fate of Selected Contaminants from
Anthropogenic Discharges in Coastal Marine Environment,
which is totally distinct from Fish Processing. The applicant
had relied on Annexure-A8 communication wherein it was
OP (CAT).No. 28 of 2019 6
specifically stated that the Administrative Experience of the
4th respondent in a Managerial Capacity was his experience
in administration in the laboratory, which according