SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 45654

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
R.BASANT, J
VINOD KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner is the husband of the de facto complainant. He faces allegations under Section 498A I.P.C. Final report has already been filed. Cognizance has been taken. The petitioner has not appeared before the learned Magistrate. Thereupon a warrant of arrest has been issued against the petitioner. The case has been transferred to the list of long pending cases. The petitioner apprehends imminent arrest in execution of coercive processes issued by the learned Magistrate.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is absolutely innocent. His absence earlier was not wilful or deliberate. The petitioner is willing to surrender before the learned Magistrate and seek regular bail. But he apprehends that his application for bail may not be considered by the learned Magistrate on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. He, therefore, prays that directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. may be issued to the learned Magistrate to release the petitioner on bail when he appears and applies for bail.

3. In Bharat Chaudhary v. State of Bihar [AIR 2003 SC 4662]

it is well settled that powers under Section 438 Cr.P.C can

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top