HIGH COURT OF KERALA
B.KEMAL PASHA, J
CHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
O R D E R
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
2. Petitioner is the 2nd accused in Crime No.84/2014 of Chirayinkeezhu Excise Range registered for the offence punishable under Section 55(i) of the Abkari Act.
3. The allegation against the petitioner and the other accused is that on 01.10.2014 at 12.30 p.m., they were found engaged in retail sales of IMFL in contravention of the provisions of the Abkari Act. The petitioner has been in custody for the period from 01.11.2014 onwards.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor has pointed out that the petitioner is the accused in five abkari cases of similar nature. The learned counsel for the petitioner has BA.8407/2014 pointed out that out those five cases, the petitioner was acquitted in three cases. It is also pointed out that the petitioner is a 65 year old man. It is pleaded that he may be enlarged on bail as last chance considering the small quantity of contraband involved. Having regard to the period undergone by the petitioner in custody, the small quantity of contraband involved and the fact that the petitioner is a 65 year old man, I am of the vie
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.