SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 48843

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

MONDAY ,THE 01ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 9TH ASWINA, 1940

Crl.MC.No. 860 of 2018

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN MC 98/2017 of

SUB.DVL.MAGISTRATE,MUVATTUPUZHA

PETITIONER:

ABID EBRAHIM

AGED 35, S/O. EIBRAHIM, ARYANKALAYIL HOUSE, KAVUMKARA

KARA, VELLOORKUNNAM VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM

DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.

SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM)

SRI.PRASANTH M.P

RESPONDENTS:

1

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUVATTUPUZHA

ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 661.

2

STATE OF KERALA

REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF

KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 031.

SRI. SANTHOSH PETER PP

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON

01.10.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner has been issued Annexure-I notice

by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Muvattupuzha

requiring him to show cause why he should not be

Crl.MC.No. 860 of 2018 2

directed to execute a bond for keeping the peace for

one year. It is stated that he is involved in three

cases registed under the Cigarettes and other Tobacco

Products(Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation

of Trade and commerce,Production, Supply and

Distribution) Act 2003. The proceedings are sought to

be quashed on the ground that the cases were registeed

long ago and there are no sufficient grounds to

initiate proceedings under Section 107 Cr.P.c.

3.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4.

It is seen from Annexure-I order (notice)

that the police officer concerned filed a report

before the Sub Divisional Magistrate that the

petitioner committed certain offences under under the

Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products(Prohibition of

Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and

commerce,Production, Supply and Distribution) Act.

Three cases were registered against him. All of them

were registered in 2015. The proceedings under

Crl.MC.No. 860 of 2018 3

Section 107 Cr.P.C were initiated in May 2017. The

police officer has no case that after 2015 the

petitioner was involved in any case. The initiation of

the proceedings under Section 107 Cr.P.C more than two

years after the registration of the cases is not

proper. So the proceedings are liable to be quashed.

In the result, Annexure-I order is quashed. The

proceedings in M.C.No.98 of 2017 on the file of the

Sub Divisional Magistrate Court, Muvattupuzha are

quuashed.

Sd/-

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

JUDGE

pm

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE I

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE SUB

DIVISIONAL MAGIATRATE, MUVATTUPUZHA DATED

17.05.2017.

ANNEXURE II

TRUE COPY OF THE SUMMONS DATED 19.05.2017.

ANNEXURE III

TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 22.03.2016.

Crl.MC.No. 860 of 2018 4

ANNEXURE IV

TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 609/2015

DATED 11.03.2015.

ANNEXURE V

TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 789/2015

DATED 01.04.2015.

ANNEXURE VI

TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.

1563/2015 DATED 04.09.2015.

ANNEXURE VII

TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE

PETITIONER BEFORE SUB DIVISIONAL

MAGISTRATE, MUVATTUPUZHA DATED 07.12.2017.

ANNEXURE VIII

CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS SHEET IN

M.C.NO.98/2017 ON THE FILES OF THE SUB

DIVISINAL MAGISTRATE COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL

// TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top