SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Online)(KER) 31842

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.M.JOSEPH, M.C.HARI RANI, JJ
A U MOHAMMED ASHRAF – Appellant
Versus
THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR HIGH COURT – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

K.M.Joseph, J.

Being connected we dispose of these appeals by this common judgment.

2. The appellant in all these cases is one and the same. He calls in question the order passed by the learned Company Judge in Co.A.No. 539 of 2005 in Report No.88 in C.P.No. 18 of 1999. He also challenges the order passed in M.C.A.No.112 of 2008 in Report No.88 in CP 18 of 1999. Lastly, he also calls in question the order passed in Co.Appl No.620 of 2008 in Report No.88 in C.P.No.18 of 1999. C.P.No.18 of 1999 was filed to wind up St. Mary's Finance Ltd.

(hereinafter referred to as the 'Company').

3. Briefly put, the case of the appellant is as follows: The appellant entered into an agreement dated 31.3.2002 with Sri.Bobby Varghese (2nd respondent) for purchase of property having an extent of 6.792 cents in COA 39,50, 60/2010 -2-

Ernakulam village. The 2nd respondent is none other than the Ex-Managing Director of the company. It is the case of the appellant that the property in the agreement originally belonged to Sri. M.U.Varkey who is the father of the 2nd respondent. The appellant paid a sum of R.10.25 lakhs to the 2nd respondent in all and after issuing lawyer notice he instituted O.S.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top