SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 15113

MUHAMMED K.P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


The appellant herein challenges the conviction and

sentence against him under Section 8(2) of the Kerala

Abakari Act (for short “the Act”) in SC No. 94/2006 of

the court of Session, Wayanad. He faced a trial before

the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc)II,

Kalpetta, on the allegation that at about 1.25 pm on

28.09.2005 at Mananthavady, he was found possessing

2400 ml of arrack, contained in 24 packets. The offenc

was detected by a Preventive Officer of the

Mananthavady Excise Circle. He arrested the accused on

the spot and seized the contraband articles as per a

mahazar. The Preventive Officer produced the accused

and the properties at the Excise Range Office,

Mananthavady where another Preventive Officer

registered the crime, and he also produced the accused

and property in court. Investigation was taken over by

the Circle Inspector of the Special Excise Squad,

Wayanad as directed by the Assistant Commissioner of

Excise, and a final report also filed by him in court.

2.

The accused appeared before the learned trial

3

Judge and pleaded not guilty to the charge framed

against him. The prosecution examined six witnesses

and proved Exts. P1 to P7 docum

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top