SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 44342

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J
AUGUSTHY – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates:
['JOHNSON MANAYANI', '', 'SRI BENHUR JOSEPH MANAYANI', 'SRI JEEVAN MATHEW MANAYANI']

JUDGMENT

The prayers in this writ petition are as follows:

i. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, orders, or directions, to the respondents to assign the 14 cents of land located besides the petitioners, Ext P1 property.

ii. Declare that, the petitioners are entitled for the assignment of 14 cents land as per the petitioners Ext P1 petition pending before the 1st respondent.

2. Heard Sri. Johnson Manayani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Saigi Jacob Paletty, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

3. According to the petitioners, they have filed Ext.P4 application before the 1st respondent RDO for grant of land assignment for the subject property for beneficial enjoyment of the property within their title. It is stated that the subject property for which assignment is sought comes to 14 cents and is adjacent and contiguous to their property coming to an extent of 54.337 cents covered by Ext.P1 registered deed. It is stated that under Rule 6, an application for assignment of land for beneficial enjoyment, is to be submitted before the Competent Revenue Divisional Officer concerned etc. Having regard to the facts and circ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top