SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39263

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J
KURUVILA – Appellant
Versus
SATHI RAJAN – Respondent


O R D E R

This petition is filed under section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash the complaint and order passed there on by the learned Magistrate in S.T. No:624/2004 of C.J.M. Court, Kottayam. That complaint was filed against the petitioner alleging commission of offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The learned Magistrate after recording the sworn statement and perusing the records issued process to the accused.

2. Petitioner contends that the cheque was issued by him to one Chithrabhanu and it was crossed by him noting “A/C Payee only”. According to the petitioner, the said cheque was never intended to be negotiated. Annexure A3 is the copy of that cheque. The accused contends that contrary to the directions, the cheque was handed over by Chithrabhanu to the complainant. On coming to know of the fact, he issued notice to the drawee bank not to honour the cheque. It was also contended that there was sufficient funds in the account of the petitioner to honour the cheque.

3. The important question raised by the petitioner is that when two parallel transverse lines are put across a cheque and when it is noted 'A/C Payee only', is that cheque negotiable and whether

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top