SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 29781

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.UBAID, J
vs


Advocates:
SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN

J U D G M E N T

The appellant herein challenges the conviction and sentence against him under Sections 55(a) and 8(2) of the Kerala Abkari Act (for short 'the Act') in S.C No.138/2006 of the Court of Session, Wayanad.

2. The prosecution case is that on 10.12.2004, at the Veluvally junction near Pulpally, the appellant was found possessing arrack contained in 235 packets of 100 ml capacity, carried in a sack. The offence was detected by an Excise Inspector of the Excise Enforcement and Anti Narcotic Special Squad, Wayanad, as part of routine patrol. He arrested the accused on the spot and seized the quantity of arrack as per a seizure mahazar. He produced the accused and the property at the Excise Range Office, where an Excise Inspector registered the crime and occurrence report. Another Excise Inspector took over investigation and submitted final report in court. On committal, the case came up before the Court of Session, from where it was made over to the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Adhoc-I, Kalpetta, for trial and disposal.

3. The accused appeared before the trial court and pleaded not guilty to the charge framed against him under Sections 55(a) and 8(2) of the Act. The prose

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top