SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 35997

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SUNIL THOMAS, J
MANU – Appellant
Versus
KUNJAMMA    Advocate -SRI K SIJU – Respondent


ORDER

Petitioners stand arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 3 arising from Crime No.89 of 2014 of Sooranadu Police Station for offences punishable under sections 341, 294(b), 323, 447 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code, on an allegation that, on 18.12.2013 at 9.30a.m., petitioners herein trespassed into the courtyard of the defacto complainant's house and wrongfully restrained and attacked the defacto complainant and CW2, who is the second respondent. Crime was registered and after investigation, final report was laid. The matter is now pending as C.C.No.1135 of 2015 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Sasthamcotta.

2. It is now claimed that the dispute with the second respondent and that of the defacto complainant has been settled along with connected crime registered as Crime No.676 of 2016 of Sooranadu Police Station. It was stated by both sides that, C.C.No.1088 of 2016 arising from the above crime was quashed by this Court by order in Crl.M.C.No.4775 of 2018, noting the settlement between the parties. It was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the second respondent/CW2 that the defacto complainant has since expired and there was a composit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top