SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 24960

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH, J
RAVI NAMBOOTHIRI – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL SATHAR – Respondent


O R D E R

The five-judge Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court expressed anxiety at the increasing criminalization of politics; but left the matter to be addressed by the Parliament. It is also observed that time has come that the Parliament must make law to ensure that persons facing serious criminal cases do not enter into the political stream. While issuing directions, the Hon'ble Apex Court directed that each contesting candidate shall fill up the form as provided by the Election Commission and the form must contain all the particulars as required therein. The question to be considered in this case is that if there is non-compliance by not including the fact and details of a criminal case where the sentence of fine is only Rs.200/-, what will be the consequence.

2. The petitioner herein is the elected candidate of Ward No.5 of Annamanada Grama Panchayath in the election held on 5.11.2015. It can be further seen that the petitioner as well as the defeated first respondent herein have obtained equal votes and the petitioner herein was declared as elected by way of lot. The first respondent filed the election petition alleging various grounds. One of the grounds highlight

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top