SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 24264

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SUNIL THOMAS, J
SAKEER HUSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON, SMT.KAVERY S THAMPI, SMT. V.SREEJA

O R D E R

The first accused in SC No.594/2014 of the Special Court for Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe(Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Manjeri for offences punishable under sections 509, 34 IPC and sections 67 and 67A of the Information Technology Act and Section 3(1) (XI) of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)

Act, has approached this court to quash the proceedings against him.

2. The defacto complainant was the collegue of the petitioner in a shop. She alleged that, in March 2009, the petitioner had taken her photograph on a mobile and with the help of a computer technician, the sexual images of other persons were morphed on a computer with the photograph of the defacto complainant, with the full knowledge that the defacto complainant belonged to a scheduled caste community. The morphed photograph and the sexual scenes were shown to the defacto complainant by the petitioner herein. Thereafter, the images were transmitted to the phone of the second accused, who spread it to several other persons through their mobiles. Alleging that the accused had committed acts which were intended to outrage her modesty and that they have committed various offences

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top