HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.T.SANKARAN, J
PADINHAREMANNIL THODIYIL HYMAVATHI AMMA – Appellant
Versus
PADINHAREMANNIL THODIYIL SUBADHRA AMMA – Respondent
O R D E R
The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.147 of 1988, on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Manjeri. The suit was for partition. The partible items are shown in two schedules, namely, schedule IIB and schedule IIC. The preliminary decree provides that the plaint IIB schedule property shall be divided into 22 shares and three shares out of the same shall be allotted to the plaintiff. The properties in plaint IIC schedule were directed to be divided into 20 shares and the plaintiff was allotted one share out of the 20 shares. It was also held that the plaintiff is entitled to get mesne profits. There was no appeal from the preliminary decree.
2. The plaintiff filed I.A.No.665 of 1990 to pass a final decree. A Commissioner was appointed, who submitted a report dated 13.7.1992. It would appear that another report dated 30.1.1995 (stated as report dated 1.2.1995 in the proceedings) was also submitted by the Commissioner. On the basis of the reports submitted by the Commissioner, the trial court passed the judgment and final decree.
3. The plaintiff filed I.A.No.241 of 1996 under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure to correct the mistakes in the final decree.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.