SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 26988

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
V.K.MOHANAN, J
SEEREVEETTIL ABDUL HAMEED – Appellant
Versus
REGINOLDSO THEOPHIL – Respondent


ORDER

Petitioner is the sole accused in C.C.No.394/2002 pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Payyannur. The second respondent herein is the de facto complainant. The prayer is to call for the records leading to C.C.No.394/2002 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court Payyannur and to quash the same. It is also prayed for setting aside Annexure-A2 Charge Report and Annexure-A4 order dated

4.7.2005 of the court below.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he was entrusted with seven wooden windows on 5.5.2002 but the same were taken for his own use without the consent of the defacto complainant and thus the accused has committed the offence punishable under Section 406 of IPC. On the basis of the information furnished in Pazhayangadi Police Station, crime No.226/2001 was registered and after investigation, the police has filed Annexure-A2 final report before the court below, on the basis of which C.C.No.394/2002 was instituted. Annexure-A1 is the F.I.R in Crime No.226/01 of the Pazhayangadi Police Station.

Annexure-A2 is the final report and Annexure-A3 is the copy of the order of this Court in Crl.M.C.No.5846/2001 and Annexure- A4 is the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top