The petitioner approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:

i) To call for the records leading to Ext.P3 and quash Ext.P3.

ii) To declare that the acceptance of land tax provisionally with

condition is illegal and unsustainable and the Village Officer

has no authority to impose any condition on the basic tax

receipt.

iii) To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or

order directing the 5^th respondent to remove the

endorsement “provisional acceptance of basic tax subjected

to High Court decision W.P.(C) No.40002/16” from Ext.P2 and

to issue regular fresh tax receipt in lieu of Ext.P2;

iv)To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or

order directing the 5^th respondent to issue possession

certificate, location sketch, ROR certificate etc. village

records in respect of the property of the petitioner covered by

Ext.P1.

2. The respondent-revenue authority refused to act upon the

request of the petitioner on account of the pendency of

W.P.(C) No.40002 of 2016. The revenue authority also refused to

issue location sketch, possession certificate and ROR certificate to the

petitioner for the reason that as per Ext.P4 proceedings of the Special

Officer,