SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 43

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.UBAID, J
YANAYATH SAIDALAVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


O R D E R

The revision petitioner herein is the sole accused in C.C.No. 193 of 1997 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Tirur. He faced prosecution before the court below under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code on the allegation that at about 10.00 a.m. on 17.02.1990, he assaulted his neighbour, Muhammed, at the boundary of his property, and inflicted a grievous hurt on his body with a stone. The accused and the injured are next door neighbours, and they are close relatives too. The incident happened in connection with a boundary dispute between them.

2. The accused appeared before the learned Magistrate, and pleaded not guilty to the charge framed against him under Section 326 IPC. The prosecution examined eight witnesses, and proved Exts. P1 to P4 documents in the trial court. The alleged weapon of offence was also identified during trial as MO1.

3. When examined under Section 313 Cr.P.C., the accused denied the incriminating circumstances, and projected a defence that the complainant in fact sustained injury in a fall. However, the accused did not adduce any evidence in defence.

4. On an appreciation of the evidence, the learned Magistrate found the accused guilty. On c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top