IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1941
Crl.MC.No. 1909 of 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 1008/2018 of ADDITIONAL
CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ,THALASSERY
CRIME NO. 306/2018 OF Edakkad Police Station , Kannur
PETITIONER/S:
ZAYANA NAZIM, AGED 21 YEARS
D/O. NAZIMUDHEEN,RESIDING AT ZAYAN,
NEAR RAJAS KALLAI SCHOOL, MADAPEEDIKA,
THALASSERY, KANNUR (DIST)
BY ADVS.
SMT.K.DEEPA (PAYYANUR)
SRI.V.R.NASAR
RESPONDENT/S:
1
STATE OF KERALA
REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM,PIN-682 031
2
SABIMA SHERIN, AGED 30 YEARS
D/O.USMAN, RESIDING AT SHABIMAS,
NEAR KANHANGAD MASJID, THOTTADA,
P.O.KIZHUNNA, KANNUR (DIST)
BY ADV. SRI.M.V.AMARESAN
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.AMJAD ALI, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR R1,
SRI.M.V.AMARESAN FOR R2
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.06.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
::2::
Crl.MC.No. 1909 of 2019
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
-----------------------------
Crl.M.C.No.1909 Of 2019
---------------------------------
Dated this the 6th day of June, 2019.
The case projected in this petition filed under Sec.482 of the
Cr.P.C is as follows:
The petitioner herein is the 3rd accused in C.C.No.1008/2018
on the file of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court,
Thalassery in Crime No.306/2018 of Edakkad Police Station,
registered for offence punishable under Sec.498A r/w Sec.34 of the
I.P.C against the petitioner and others, viz., her husband , father-
in-law and unmarried sister-in-law respectively as accused Nos.1 to
3. The substance of the allegations against the petitioners is that
the 1st accused married the defacto complainant on 11.4.2013, that
thereafter during the married life, the accused persons harassed
the defacto complainant mentally as well as physically, demanding
more dowry. Thus all the accused committed the abovesaid
offences. The petitioner would allege that in fact, the above case
has been filed with some ulterior motive of grabbing money from
the petitioner. There is no ingredient to attract the abovesaid
::3::
offences as alleged by the prosecution against any of the accused,
especially against the petitioner. Even if the prosecution case is
assumed to be true, there is no specific allegation against the
petitioner. According to the defacto complainant herself, after one
month of the marriage itself, both the husband and wife went to
Gulf. From Gulf, both husband and wife have lived together at the
flat of the defacto complainant. The one and only allegation raised
against the petitioner is that she had made attempt to separate 1st
accused- husband and the defacto complainant-wife by saying lies
to the husband about the wife. Those types of vague allegations are
not at all sufficient to attract the alleged offence of Sec.498A
against her. The only intention of the defacto complainant is that
to spoil the future and marriage prospects of the unmarried
petitioner by implicating her in a false criminal case. There is no
specific incident of cruelty alleged against the petitioner in Anx-I & II
so as to attract the offence of Sec.498A r/w Sec.34 of the I.P.C. There
is not even a remote probability of the case ending in conviction of
the petitioner and the whole proceedings are vitiated by malafides
and the case against the petitioner is a glaring instance of the abuse
of the process of court. In very many case, the Apex Court held
::4::
that without specific material or evidence it will be hazardous to
ask the accused to face trial. It is in the light of these averments,
that the petitioner has filed the instant petition under Sec.482 of
the Cr.P.C with the following prayers:
“ (i)
to quash Annexure-II final report and all the further
proceeding
pending
against
the
petitioner
in
C.C.No.1008/2018 of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate
Court, Thalassery in Crime No.306/2018 of the Edakkad Police
Station, Kannur, and
(ii)
to issue any other order or direction that Hon'ble Court may
deem fit and proper from time to time for the petitioner to
attain the ends of justice.”
2.
Heard Smt.K.Deepa (Payyannur), learned counsel for
the petitioner, Sri.Amjad Ali, learned Prosecutor for the
1st respondent and Sri.M.V.Amaresan, learned counsel for the
2nd respondent-lady defacto complainant.
3.
From the factual materials it is seen that the impugned
criminal proceedings as per Anx-II Final Report/charge sheet was
filed in Crime No.306/2018 of Edakkad Police Station, which has
now led to the institution of C.C.No.1008/2018 on the file of the
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thalassery. That after
the marriage of the 2nd respondent with the brother of the
petitioner-accused No.3, the 2nd
respondent-lady defacto
complainant has been subjected to cruelty and harassment by her
husband (accused No.1), husband's father (accused No.2),
::5::
husband's unmarried sister (accused No.3), etc. It is common
ground that the petitioner (A-3) is the unmarried sister of A-1. The
allegations raised against the petitioner (A-3) in Anx-I c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.