The petitioner approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:

i) To issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ or order

quashing Ext.P3;

ii) To declare that the acceptance of land tax provisionally with

condition is illegal and unsustainable and the Village Officer has

no authority to impose any condition on the basic tax receipt.

iii) To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or order

directing the 5^th respondent to remove the endorsement

“provisionally accepted”.

High Court case No.W.P.(C)

No.40002/16” from Ext.P2 and to issue regular fresh tax receipt in

lieu of Ext.P2;

iv)To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or order

directing the 5^th respondent to issue possession certificate,

location sketch, ROR certificate etc. village records in respect of

the property of the petitioner covered by Ext.P1.

2. The respondent-revenue authority refused to act upon the

request of the petitioner on account of the pendency of

W.P.(C) No.40002 of 2016. The revenue authority also refused to

issue location sketch, possession certificate and ROR certificate to the

petitioner for the reason that as per Ext.P4 proceedings of the Special

Off