SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 28227

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.HEMA, J
OUSEPH – Appellant
Versus
EXCISE RANGE INSPECTOR – Respondent


ORDER

Revision petitioner was convicted and sentenced for offence under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of `.25,000/- and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months. In appeal, the Sessions Court confirmed the conviction, but altered the sentence to three months' rigorous imprisonment. This revision is filed against the said conviction and sentence.

2. According to prosecution, on 04.01.1997 at about 6.30 p.m., while PW1, the Excise Inspector and party, including PW4 and another official witness, were on patrol duty in Kumbalagad desom, they saw the accused carrying a can containing arrack along the road in front of the house of one Sreedharan, PW3. On examination of the article, it was found to contain about 2.5 litres CRRP 652/02 2 of arrack. The accused was arrested and on questioning, he took out aluminum can, pot etc., which are marked as MOs 2 to 4, fifteen yards away from the first place of recovery near a paddy field. Samples were taken from the arrack seized and mahazar- Ext.P2 was also prepared and articles were seized. Ext.P1 occurrence report was prepared and complain

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top