MUHAMED RIYAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
The petitioners herein are accused Nos. 1 to 4 in the impugned Anx-A
FIR in Crime No.648/2018 of Kasaragode Police Station, Kasaragode
district, registered for offences punishable under Secs.403, 406 and 498A of
the Indian Penal Code. It is stated that now the entire disputes between the
petitioner and the 2nd respondent defacto complainant have been settled
amicably and that the 2nd respondent has sworn to Anx.B affidavit before this
Court, wherein it is stated that she has settled the entire disputes with the
petitioner and that she has no objection for quashment of the impugned
criminal proceedings pending against the petitioner. It is in the light of these
aspects that the petitioner has preferred the instant Crl.M.C. with the prayer
to quash the impugned criminal proceedings against him.
2.
In a catena of decisions, the Apex Court has held that, in
appropriate cases involving even non-compoundable offences, the High
Court can quash prosecution by exercise of the powers under Sec.482 of the
Cr.P.C., if the parties have really settled the whole dispute or if the
continuance of the prosecution will not serve any purpose. Here, this Court
finds a real case
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.