SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(KER) 24215

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
vs
CRIMINAL MISC. CASE 6289/2015



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID

MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/6TH ASWINA, 1937

Crl.MC.No. 6289 of 2015 ()

---------------------------

CRMP 2306/2015 of II ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE (VACATION JUDGE), KOLLAM

CRIME NO. 807/2015 OF KOLLAM WEST POLICE STATION , KOLLAM DISTRICT

========================

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

-----------------------------------

MURUKAN, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O. SHANTHAKUMARAN

MURUKALAYAM, JAYAN NAGAR-6

DEPOT PURAYIDOM, KOLLAM WEST VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

--------------------------------------------

STATE REPRESENTED BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER

KOLLAM WEST POLICE STATION IN KOLLAM DISTRICT

THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA

ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. SHEEBA M.T.

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-09-2015, THE

COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.MC.No. 6289 of 2015 ()

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

------------------------------------

ANNEXURE A1- THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26-08-2015 IN CRL.MP.NO.

2306/2015 OF THE II ADDTIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE (VACATIONAL

JUDGE), KOLLAM.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS

--------------------------------------

NIL

TRUE COPY

P.A. TO JUDGE

SD

P. UBAID, J.

---------------------------------------

Crl.M.C.No.6289 of 2015

---------------------------------------

Dated this the 28th day of September, 2015

O R D E R

The petitioner herein seeks modification of a condition

imposed by the learned II Additional Session Judge (Vacation

Judge), Kollam, while granting bail to him under Section 439

Cr.P.C. in connection with Crime No.807/2015 of the Kollam West

Police Station registered under Sections 366 and 376 IPC and

Section 3(a) and 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual

Offences Act. The petitioner is required to execute a bond for

Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties, of whom one shall be a

close relative of the accused. The petitioner's grievance is that

none of his relatives has landed property, and so none of his

relatives is in a position to execute the bond. On the said ground,

the petitioner seeks modification of the condition. The petitioner

has no case that he has no relatives of his own to execute the

bond as ordered. If the petitioner has relatives, any of them can

come forward and make a request before the court below under

Section 445 Cr.P.C. That the relatives have no properties, cannot

be a ground to modify or cancel the condition. The willing surety

can very well make an application before the court below under

Crl.M.C.. No. 6289/2015

2

Section 445 Cr.P.C. with request for permission to deposit the

bond amount in lieu of execution of bond.

With these observations, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of.

Sd/-

P. UBAID, JUDGE

sd

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top