SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 40239

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, J
BEEVI YOUSF – Appellant
Versus
ADDL R4 THE SENIOR TOWN PLANNER – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The petitioners, who are stated to be the owners of property having an extent of 5.79 Ares in Re-survey No.62/2 of Thrikkakara North Village, have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P4 communication No.BA-115/16 dated 07.03.2019 issued by the 3rd respondent, who is the Secretary of the 2nd respondent Municipality, as it is arbitrary, illegal and void. The petitioners have also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding the 3rd respondent to issue them building permit based on application dated 12.04.2016. The further relief sought for is a writ of mandamus commanding the 3rd respondent to accept an affidavit from the petitioners agreeing to demolish the construction, without claiming any compensation, as and when Ext.P3 scheme is implemented.

2. On 27.03.2019, when this writ petition came up for admission, the 3rd respondent Secretary of the Municipality was directed to file an affidavit explaining the facts and circumstances in issuing Ext.P4 order in the light of the observations contained in Ext.P2 order of the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions in Appeal No.71 of 2017.

3. On 23.05.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top