ORDER

This revision is filed challenging the order passed by the court below in OP(Ele) No.29 of 2007 on the file of the Additional District Judge-I, Mavelikara.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the Board. 3. In this revision, along with C.M.Appl.No.101 of 2013, the revision petitioner has produced two documents to receive in evidence. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner, for the reasons stated in the affidavit that he could not produce those documents to establish his plea regarding value of the land which is the subject matter of the above original petition before the court below. This Court while exercising power of revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, do not have power to receive additional evidence. The fact remains that the court below fixed land value at Rs.8000/- per cent, for want of any evidence on the side of the petitioner. The court below C.R.P.No.80 of 2013 2 while fixing the land value found as follows: “While considering the value of the property per cent when nothing is in evidence other than the interested testimony of the petitioner and respondent, the only way out is