HIGH COURT OF KERALA
R.BASANT, J
SATHYAN @ AYYAPPA SATHYAN – Appellant
Versus
YOUSEF – Respondent
ORDER
Does the criminal court have the power to direct payment of interest on the amount of compensation directed to be paid under Sec.357(3) of the Cr.P.C? This interesting question arises for consideration in this revision petition which is directed against a concurrent verdict of guilty, conviction and sentence in a prosecution under Section 138 of the N.I Act.
2. The cheque is for an amount of Rs.25,000/- and bears the date 01.11.2004. Signature in the cheque is admitted. Notice of demand succeeded in evoking only Ext.D1 reply notice. No payment was made. The complainant examined himself as PW1 and proved Exts.P1 to P5. The accused did not adduce any oral evidence. He proved Exts.D1 & D2. The accused raised a plea that the cheque was not issued for the due discharge of any legally enforceable debt/liability; but was issued only as security in a transaction between the wife of the accused and the complainant.
3. The courts below concurrently came to the conclusion that the complainant has succeeded in establishing all ingredients of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I Act. Accordingly they proceeded to pass the impugned concurrent judgments. The petitioner faces the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.