SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Online)(KER) 1095

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
R.BASANT, J
SATHYAN @ AYYAPPA SATHYAN – Appellant
Versus
YOUSEF – Respondent


ORDER

Does the criminal court have the power to direct payment of interest on the amount of compensation directed to be paid under Sec.357(3) of the Cr.P.C? This interesting question arises for consideration in this revision petition which is directed against a concurrent verdict of guilty, conviction and sentence in a prosecution under Section 138 of the N.I Act.

2. The cheque is for an amount of Rs.25,000/- and bears the date 01.11.2004. Signature in the cheque is admitted. Notice of demand succeeded in evoking only Ext.D1 reply notice. No payment was made. The complainant examined himself as PW1 and proved Exts.P1 to P5. The accused did not adduce any oral evidence. He proved Exts.D1 & D2. The accused raised a plea that the cheque was not issued for the due discharge of any legally enforceable debt/liability; but was issued only as security in a transaction between the wife of the accused and the complainant.

3. The courts below concurrently came to the conclusion that the complainant has succeeded in establishing all ingredients of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I Act. Accordingly they proceeded to pass the impugned concurrent judgments. The petitioner faces the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top