SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39584

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
M.R.ANITHA, J
C.V.HAMZA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
Sri.P.V.ANOOP

O R D E R

This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed against the concurrent finding of guilt, conviction and sentence passed against the revision petitioners.

2. Prosecution case is that on 23.03.2006 at about 17.00 hours accused were found to be keeping blue kerosene, to be given in subsidy by the Government, at Panniyankara Chamundi Valappu in the lonely property situated on the eastern side of the road for sale, without any permit or valid documents and thereby accused committed the offences punishable under Rule 16 of the Kerala Kerosene Control Order, 1968 r/w. Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

3. On the side of the prosecution, PW1 to PW6 were examined and Exts.P1 to P6 were marked. MO1 to MO11 were identified and marked. After the closure of prosecution evidence, accused were questioned under Section 313 Cr.P.C. They denied all the incriminating facts and circumstances put to them and there was no defence evidence. Thereafter, on hearing both sides, the trial court found both accused guilty under Sections 3 and 7 (1) (a) (ii) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months each and to a pay fine o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top