SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39948

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
R.BASANT, N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
ABDUL RAHIMAN – Appellant
Versus
LALLI DEVASIA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

BASANT, J.

Claimant/injured is the appellant. The court below under Section

163 A of the Motor Vehicles Act awarded an amount of Rs.78,500/- as compensation as against Rs.7,00,000/- claimed as per the details given below:-

1. Pain and suffering - Rs.5,000/-, 2. Medical expenses - Rs.15,000/-, 3. Loss of earnings - Rs.7,500/-

(6 x 1,250/-)

4. Reduction in earning capacity - Rs.51,000/-

(1250 x 12 x 17 x 8/100)

____________

Total Rs.78,500/-

===========

2. The appellant/injured/claimant claims to be aggrieved by the impugned order. What is the grievance? The learned counsel for the claimant/appellant first of all prays that notwithstanding the fact that the claim was erroneously described as one under Section 163 A of the Motor Vehicles Act, the same may be reckoned as one under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act. I.A No. 441 of 2010 has been filed for that purpose. No objection has been filed. We are persuaded to feel, in the facts and circumstances of this case, that the petition deserves to be allowed in the interests of justice. We note that though the claim was described to be one under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, definite allegations were made of negligence on the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top