SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39359

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.R.RAMAN, P.BHAVADASAN, JJ
SREESAILAM CHITTIES & LOANS P LTD – Appellant
Versus
JACOB MATHEW SO MATHEW – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Raman, J, This is an appeal filed by one of the creditors of third respondent at the execution stage. Third respondent herein, against whom there is a mortgage decree obtained by the second respondent Federal Bank. On execution of the decree, property of the third respondent was sold and purchased by the first respondent. Sale certificate was also issued. The appellant herein filed a claim petition under Order 21 Rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure. He also filed an application under Order 21 Rule 58. It is found that there is no material irregularity or fraud and dismissed the application filed under Order 21 Rule 90. The application filed under Order 21 Rule 58 was also dismissed finding that he has no claim. Hence this appeal is filed.

2. It is contended that the appellant had filed an Ex.F.A.103/2009. 2 insolvency petition before the Sub Court, Trichur for declaring the third respondent herein as an insolvent, wherein the present debt of the Bank is also included, and according to him the Bank having thus opted to come within the insolvency proceedings for ratable distribution of the assets of the third respondent, the Bank ought to have disclosed the same at the time

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top