SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 362

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH, J
M K ANOOP – Appellant
Versus
UPPOT KOTTAYI PANKAJAVALLY – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This is a petition filed by the plaintiff in O.S.No.49 of

2015, on the files of Additional Sub Judge, Vadakara. The judgment and preliminary decree was passed in the said original suit on 04.03.2016. After perusal of the same, when the petitioner found that there are errors crept in, in the said judgment and decree, I.A.No 214 of 2017 in O.S.No.49 of 2015 was filed under Section 152 of CPC to correct the decree. The court below also found that some mistakes are crept in, in the judgment and preliminary decree. Even though a list of corrections are sought, the said petition was allowed only partly, ie, 4 corrections are allowed by the order. Some correction are not allowed on the view that those correction will not come under the purview of Section 152 of CPC. that those facts can be only considered by an appellate court.

2. But considering the contentions and submissions made before this Court, it appears that if the errors pointed out are errors on the face of the records, it may not be come under the purview of Section 152 of CPC, but, surely, can be reviewed by the Court which passed the decree.

3. Under such circumstances, without notice to the other side, this petition is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top