SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Online)(KER) 38536

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J
ARUMUGHAN SO MADHAVAN KIDANGATH HOUSE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION 2189/2011



Voluntary composition of compoundable offences is valid under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if no collusion exists.

Headnote:

Composition - Criminal Proceedings - Code of Criminal Procedure Section 320 - Summary of the court's consideration of the composition petition, highlighting the voluntary agreement of parties and the legal permissibility under the Code.

Fact of the Case:

The parties jointly filed a composition petition for offences under IPC, leading to the magistrate's enquiry to confirm the voluntary settlement without collusion, supported by witness statements.

Finding of the Court:

The magistrate concluded that the composition was valid as both parties agreed voluntarily and the offences were compoundable under Section 320, allowing for acceptance of the composition.

Issues: Whether the composition of offences by the parties is permissible under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld that the offences are compoundable as per Section 320, and voluntary agreement of parties negates any collusion, legitimizing the settlement.

Final Decision: The conviction and sentence against the accused are set aside, resulting in an acquittal.

O R D E R

Read the order dated 24.10.2011, by which the composition petition filed filed by the parties jointly, the accused and the de facto complainant was sent over to the magistrate before whose court the trial of the case was conducted to have an enquiry over the composition stated to have been effected by the parties.

2. The magistrate after conducting such enquiry has sent a report in which it is stated that the accused and also the de facto complainant and another charge witness appeared before him. Statements of CW.1 & CW2, the injured in the case, were also recorded. On the enquiry conducted, the magistrate, it is stated, has come to the conclusion that the parties have voluntarily Crl.R.P.No.2189 of 2011 effected the settlement and there is no collusion. The identity of the parties involved in the proceedings has also been found established in the enquiry. In the circumstances, the request for composition made by the parties jointly, the accused and also the de facto complainant deserves consideration. The offences with which the accused has been convicted other than Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, which is not independent other than the other offences imputed, are compoundable under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure {for short “the Code”}.

3. So much so, there is no legal hurdle in accepting the request made for composition. Composition of the offences requested for by the parties is accepted and the conviction and sentence imposed against the accused are set aside passing Crl.R.P.No.2189 of 2011 an order of acquittal in their favour for the offences under Sections 143, 148, 147, 148 and 447 of the Indian Penal Code as under Section 320(8) of the Code.

Revision is disposed of as indicated above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top