SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 29139

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SUNIL THOMAS, J
KOYA KUTTY – Appellant
Versus
ASEES – Respondent


ORDER

Revision petitioner herein stands indicted for offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, convicted and sentenced by both trial court and appellate court. According to the complainant, accused had borrowed 35 sovereigns of gold ornaments from the complainant in the year 2002. A part of the gold ornaments were returned. Gold ornaments worth Rs.2,00,000/- were due. A mediation was attempted in December 2010, which failed. Thereafter, accused and his sons physically assaulted the complainant, which resulted in a crime being registered. During the pendency of the crime, accused and his children approached the complainant and settled the dispute. Towards the discharge of the money due, a cheque of Rs.2,00,000/- was issued. The cheque was presented for collection and was returned dishonoured. After issuing statutory notice, complaint was laid. Accused had appeared and contested the proceedings. According to him, Ext.P1 cheque was given for settling the criminal case. He contended that there was no legally enforceable debt and that, the cheque was not supported by consideration.

2. On the side of the complainant, he was examined as PW1 and he relied on Ext

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top