SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 26494

JOY.K.A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
['C A CHACKO', '', 'SMT C M CHARISMA', 'SMT MEGHA K XAVIER']

The prayer in the above Criminal Miscellaneous Case filed under

Sec.482 of the Cr.P.C is as follows:

“............. to quash Annexure A1 FIR in Crime No.116/2019 of

Vadakkekara Police Station, Ernakulam District and its further

proceedings, so as to secure the ends of justice.”

2.

The petitioner has been arrayed as accused in Anx-A1 Crime

No.116/2019 of Vadakkekara Police Station, for offence punishable

under Sec.294(b) of the I.P.C. The gist of the prosecution in the above

crime is that on 5.2.2019 at about 4:30 p.m. the petitioner, who is the

neighbour of the defacto complainant, told the workers who came to her

house for doing some grill works no to do any work there and when the

defacto complainant enquired about the same, he abused her, etc.

Accordingly, the lady defacto complainant had lodged the abovesaid FI

statement/complaint against the petitioner which has led to the

registration of the abovesaid Crime. The petitioner would allege that the

defacto complainant has prior animosity against him as he made

complaint before the Panchayat against the unauthorised constructions

made by her attaching the northern boundary wall of the petitioner.

::3::

The pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top