SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 60182

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANU FRANCIS – Appellant
Versus
CIJO JOHN    Advocate - AJEESH S BRITE ,AJEESH S BRITE – Respondent


A.M.Shaffique

, J.

This appeal is filed by the respondent in O.P.

(G&W)No.241 of 2011 challenging the order dated

19.7.2012 passed by the Family Court, Thodupuzha

regarding custody of the minor child. In fact no specific

direction had been issued regarding the custody of the

minor child. The following directions had been issued in

the order passed by the Family Court:-

(1)

The respondent is directed to produce

the child at the Counselling Centre at Family Court

Thodupuzha at 11 a.m. on 1st and 3rd Saturdays

and handover the child to the petitioner. The

petitioner/father or his relatives can fondle the

child and return at 1 pm. This arrangement shall

commence from 4.8.12 and continue until further

orders.

(2)

The respondent/mother is directed to

inform the mobile number to the petitioner and

also the land line number to enable the petitioner

to call the child.

(3)

In case the respondent/mother is

incapable of producing the child she shall inform

..3..

the petitioner in time so as to avoid inconvenience

to the petitioner and she shall produce child on the

next working Saturdays.”

2.

The learned counsel for the appellant/mother

submits that the father is not interested i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top