HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANU FRANCIS – Appellant
Versus
CIJO JOHN Advocate - AJEESH S BRITE ,AJEESH S BRITE – Respondent
A.M.Shaffique
, J.
This appeal is filed by the respondent in O.P.
(G&W)No.241 of 2011 challenging the order dated
19.7.2012 passed by the Family Court, Thodupuzha
regarding custody of the minor child. In fact no specific
direction had been issued regarding the custody of the
minor child. The following directions had been issued in
the order passed by the Family Court:-
(1)
The respondent is directed to produce
the child at the Counselling Centre at Family Court
Thodupuzha at 11 a.m. on 1st and 3rd Saturdays
and handover the child to the petitioner. The
petitioner/father or his relatives can fondle the
child and return at 1 pm. This arrangement shall
commence from 4.8.12 and continue until further
orders.
(2)
The respondent/mother is directed to
inform the mobile number to the petitioner and
also the land line number to enable the petitioner
to call the child.
(3)
In case the respondent/mother is
incapable of producing the child she shall inform
..3..
the petitioner in time so as to avoid inconvenience
to the petitioner and she shall produce child on the
next working Saturdays.”
2.
The learned counsel for the appellant/mother
submits that the father is not interested i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.