HIGH COURT OF KERALA
HARUN-UL-RASHID, J
KARMALLY – Appellant
Versus
CELEENA & OTHERS – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
The appeal is directed against the order dated 24.11.2010 in I.A.No.371/2008 in A.S.No.82/2001 on the file of the Sub Court, Cherthala. The appellant is the plaintiff in O.S.No.545/1998 on the file of the Munsiff Court, Cherthala. Suit was filed for a decree of permanent injunction. The defendants contested the suit and filed counter claim. The learned Munsiff dismissed the suit and allowed the counter claim. The plaintiff preferred A.S.No.82/2001.
2. The learned Judge observed that the appellant was not vigilant in prosecuting the case and that whenever the matter was taken up for hearing he did not show any interest in arguing the case and always sought for adjournment. The learned Judge also referred to the various application filed by the appellant. The learned Judge observed that the applications are not properly prosecuted nor the appellant was interested in co-operating with the court in the hearing and disposal of the appeal. In these circumstances, the appeal was dismissed for default on 8.2.2008.
::2::
3. Subsequently, the petitioner filed the present I.A, 371/2008 for re-admitting the appeal dismissed for default. The learned Judge made the observations which
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.