A.HARIPRASAD, J

Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and respondent.

2.

Revision petitioner is the tenant, who suffered an order of

eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent

Control) Act, 1965 (in short 'the Act'). He unsuccessfully challenged the

eviction order before the Rent Control Appellate Authority. Being

dissatisfied with the concurrent findings against him, the tenant has

preferred this revision.

R.C.R No.39 of 2018 3

3.

Brief facts, relevant for disposal of the revision, are as follows :

Petition schedule building along with other rooms originally

belonged to the respondent's father. The revision petitioner took the

building on lease from him. Thereafter, the petitioner obtained right in

respect of the building by virtue of a partition deed. Respondent filed R.C.P

No.102 of 2005 before the Rent Control Court, Kozhikode, seeking eviction

of the revision petitioner. The petition was allowed against which the

revision petitioner preferred R.C.A No.133 of 2006 before the Rent Control

Appellate Authority, Kozhikode. Against the dismissal of a ground under

Section 11