SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39445

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.R.RAMAN, V.K.MOHANAN, JJ
M D VARADARAJAN – Appellant
Versus
DEVAPALAN SO LAGE NARAYANAN – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Raman, J.

This appeal arises out of the judgment and decree in O.S.No.168/2000 of the Sub Court, Alappuzha. The suit is one for partition. Defendant No.22 is the appellant herein. The suit property jointly belonged to one Rajan and his wife Sulochana. They had no issues. Rajan died in 1991. Subsequently, Sulochana died intestate in 1993. Hence succession is governed by the provisions of Hindu Succession Act, 1956. But the point in controversy is as to whether the estate of the deceased will devolve on the legal heirs as per Section 16 or Section 17 of the Hindu Succession Act. In this regard it is contended by the learned Counsel, Sri Sadananda Prabhu, appearing for the appellant that at the time Sulochana died in 1993 she is not governed by the marumakkathayam law, since the marumakkathayam law in the State of Kerala had been repealed by the provisions contained in the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975. According to him, since the succession opens in 1993, on the death of Sulochana when she is not governed by the marumakkathayam law, the estate of the deceased will be devolved on the legal heirs in terms of Section 17 of the Hindu Succession Act. Per co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top